Breaking News Bar
posted: 4/4/2013 5:00 AM

Slates are not good for ECC

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 

I've been watching this (2013) and the previous (2011) election for ECC trustee and am disturbed by the slates developing in support of candidates. This is supposed to be a nonpartisan election with the candidates presenting themselves as individuals to the electorate. In 2011, two of the board members formed a slate with a third desired candidate in an attempt to ensure their election. The same thing has occurred this year.

We have an opportunity for diversity not only in culture but also in opinion and direction this year. We have an opportunity to have discussions and votes which will show the diversity of the Board. We have a chance to elect a group of board members who will discuss the options open to them and then vote their diverse directions instead of the current lack of discussion and 6 to 1 votes.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Thus, I have two suggestions for you as you determine for whom you will vote:

Vote for Nadia Daley as the 4-year candidate. She is a recent product of ECC who knows from her days as a student how and where we may improve our academic directions. She also understands the need to lower the ECC Tax Levy which results in an annual increase in our real estate tax rates.

Review the remaining candidates and vote for one from each slate being presented to you. Do not vote for two individuals from the same slate who will vote in the same direction without discussion. Ensure your vote provides for a diversity of opinion which will insure a full discussion of the matters brought before the board. Eliminate that 6-to-1 vote and ensure a wide range of discussion and direction.

Robert A. Getz

Elgin

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here