Breaking News Bar
posted: 1/24/2013 4:40 AM

Hobby Lobby has another option

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 

Hobby Lobby has another option

In the Thursday, Dec. 27, business section it was reported the Supreme Court denied a petition by Hobby Lobby. The petition asked the court to block a provision of the health care law requiring Hobby Lobby to provide birth control and the morning after pill in violation of the owners' faith.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

As of Jan. 1, Hobby Lobby either violates its faith or pays a daily $1.3 million fine.

There is a third option available to Hobby Lobby. They can close their business. When I conduct business I follow the law and I certainly do not engage in behavior contrary to my core beliefs. Although it would be a shame to lose the jobs Hobby Lobby creates, on Jan. 1 Hobby Lobby either renders unto Caesar what is Caesar's or closes shop. Any other course reveals that this petition was a shamefully hypocritical effort to maximize corporate profits utilizing a proclamation of faith.

Patrick McNamara's letter, on the same subject, appears in the Jan. 16 Fencepost. The flaw in his logic is that although Hobby Lobby is privately owned, it employs, operates and profits in the public sphere and is subject to law. The health care law is not a violation of The First Amendment. It would be a violation to allow exemptions favoring certain religions. I suggest reading the Federalist Papers, the Detached Memorandum, and more by James Madison, the father of the constitution, to see the intent of The First Amendment.

I also find it ironic that a corporation with vast female patronage is usurping what should be a woman's private reproductive choice.

Walter Naaf

Pingree Grove

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here