Breaking News Bar
updated: 12/6/2012 3:52 PM

Palatine officials happy with progress at Kostka property

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Former Palatine Councilman Warren Kostka's has avoided fines and a possible demolition of his home on North Forest Avenue -- for now. Kostka abided by a court order to clean up portions of the dilapidated structure, but still has more work ahead of him.

       Former Palatine Councilman Warren Kostka's has avoided fines and a possible demolition of his home on North Forest Avenue -- for now. Kostka abided by a court order to clean up portions of the dilapidated structure, but still has more work ahead of him.
    George LeClaire | Staff Photographer

  • Former Palatine Councilman Warren Kostka's has avoided fines and a possible demolition of his home on North Forest Avenue -- for now. Kostka abided by a court order to clean up portions of the dilapidated structure, but still has more work ahead of him.

       Former Palatine Councilman Warren Kostka's has avoided fines and a possible demolition of his home on North Forest Avenue -- for now. Kostka abided by a court order to clean up portions of the dilapidated structure, but still has more work ahead of him.
    George LeClaire | Staff Photographer

  • Warren Kostka

      Warren Kostka

 

The years-long property dispute between a controversial former Palatine council member and the village appears headed to a resolution that doesn't include fines or a demolition order.

Warren Kostka abided by Cook County Judge Margarita Kulys Hoffman's instructions to remove a tarp and boards from his house on the 100 block of North Forest Avenue, code violations village officials considered dangerous life-safety issues.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

"Those were the major ones," Village Manager Reid Ottesen said after a brief hearing Thursday morning at the courthouse in Rolling Meadows. "From our standpoint, he's in compliance with the current court order."

Kostka has until the end of the year to address the more minor violations that remain, including cleaning up debris on the property, patching up parts of broken driveway and repairing missing siding. He's due back in court Jan. 11.

The normally outspoken Kostka didn't attend Thursday's status hearing and couldn't be reached for comment. His attorney, Robert Egan, also didn't return messages.

Kostka, who served on the village council from 1997 to 2005 and ran for mayor in 2009, blames his property woes on frequent severe flooding. He claims Palatine caused the flooding when it disconnected its stormwater and sewer systems 25 years ago.

More than half of his home is now affected by differential settlement, he said. An engineering report he commissioned attributed disrepair problems, including a sagging roof, to the foundation settlement.

In October, he got a quote from a Palatine construction company stating it would cost nearly $165,000 to remove and replace the damaged section of his house.

Neighbors upset with the state of the property, which at times also has included trenches, sandbags and a banner reading "WANT WATER? Buy A Home In Palatine," have complained to the village and attended court proceedings. Their complaints partly prompted the village's legal action against Kostka and his wife back in March.

"This has been going on for several years," Ottesen said. "I'll be happy to have this matter behind us."

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here