Breaking News Bar
updated: 6/17/2014 9:18 AM

Appellate judges reverse ruling on secret court records

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Adel Daoud

      Adel Daoud

 
Associated Press

Attorneys for a 20-year-old man accused of trying to ignite a bomb in Chicago will not be allowed unprecedented access to secret intelligence court records, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Monday, reversing a trial court and handing a victory to the federal government.

The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an unusually quick ruling, releasing its opinion just days after oral arguments in a case that touched on hotly debated surveillance issues raised by former government contractor Edward Snowden.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Prosecutors argued in their written appeal that letting Adel Daoud's lawyers see records submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court would be a dangerous "sea change" in established procedures and endanger national security.

In its Monday opinion, the appellate court agreed.

"Our own study of the classified material has convinced us that there are indeed compelling reasons of national security for (the records) being classified" and kept from the defense, the appellate court opinion said.

Snowden's revelations about expanded U.S. phone and Internet spying and how the FISA court secretly signed off on them raised a furor over the practices.

Daoud, a U.S. citizen from Hillside, has denied allegations he accepted a phony car bomb from undercover FBI agents in 2012, parked it by a Chicago bar and pressed a trigger. His trial is scheduled to start Nov. 10.

Since Congress created the FISA court in 1978, no defense attorneys had been told they could go through a FISA application -- until U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman's January 29 ruling in Daoud's case. At the time, she said the fact that no judge had ever granted such FISA access before wasn't a reason not to do it now.

The defense has said the FISA documents -- submitted with a request to secretly record Daoud -- could indicate that expanded surveillance led investigators to target Daoud. If so, they could challenge all subsequent evidence on constitutional grounds.

During oral argument, defense attorney Thomas Durkins said Daoud was working on a term paper about Osama bin Laden around 2012 and that the FISA records could shed light on whether U.S. investigators flagged Daoud because of Internet searches regarding bin Laden.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here