Breaking News Bar
updated: 5/13/2014 12:31 AM

Quality starts but not quality finishes for Cubs

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • The Cubs' Junior Lake watches his 3-run homer as Cardinals catcher Yadier Molina looks on in the second inning Monday night. Lake finished with 6 RBI.

      The Cubs' Junior Lake watches his 3-run homer as Cardinals catcher Yadier Molina looks on in the second inning Monday night. Lake finished with 6 RBI.
    Associated Press

 
 

The 2014 Chicago Cubs aren't a good team by any stretch. Their 13-24 record suggests they're pretty bad at this point.

But this bunch of Cubs is epically bad at one thing: wasting quality starts by their pitchers.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

They didn't get a quality start Monday night from Travis Wood against the Cardinals, but they hardly needed one in a rollicking 17-5 victory at Busch Stadium. The Cubs enjoyed season highs in runs and hits (20) while getting home runs from Mike Olt and Junior Lake, who had 6 RBI.

Wood didn't do enough to get a quality start (at least 6 innings pitched and 3 or fewer earned runs allowed) as he gave up 5 runs (4 earned) over 6 innings.

Not taking advantage of quality starts has been an interesting phenomenon for the Cubs. They have lost each of their previous six games in which their pitcher turned in a quality start.

Included in that stretch was a 9-inning, no-run performance by Jeff Samardzija, a 7-inning, 1-run outing by Edwin Jackson and 6 more shutout innings by Samardzija.

Know this about quality starts: Teams that get them usually win. The 2012 Cubs, who lost 101 games, had a record of 42-31 when getting a quality start, and even that poor club lost no more than four in a row when getting a quality start.

Last year's team, which lost 96 games, went 52-39 when its pitchers turned in a quality start. So this trend bodes ill for the 2014 edition.

In 21 quality-start games, the team is 7-14, even as its starting pitchers have turned in a cumulative ERA of 2.06 in their quality starts. Here are recent comparisons after 21 quality-start games:

• The 2013 Cubs were 12-9 in quality start games, and the starters had an ERA of 2.01. The team's overall record after it had gotten 21 quality starts was 13-21.

• The '12 club also was 12-9 in quality-start games, with the pitchers having a sparkling 1.55 ERA in those games. The Cubs were 15-24 overall by their time they got 21 quality starts.

• Going back to 2011, the Cubs were 14-7 in their first 21 quality-start games, with the starters putting up a 2.00 ERA in those games. The team overall was 24-36 by the time the pitchers reached 21 quality starts.

This is a trend that holds up pretty well over the years. In other words, if you get a quality start, chances are you win, no matter how bad your team.

Not this year's Cubs. No so far anyway. Usually, when a team loses when it gets a quality start, one of two things happen: the offense didn't hit or the bullpen blew up.

But a rare offensive explosion Monday overrode pretty much everything. The Cubs scored 4 runs in the first inning, 2 coming in on Olt's homer. They scored 3 more in the second on Lake's homer. Wood allowed the Cardinals to come within 9-5 in the fifth, but he was able to ride it out, quality start or not.

bmiles@dailyherald.com

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here