Breaking News Bar
updated: 10/23/2013 10:06 PM

Obama sides with Tea Party as House passes dredging bill

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Two people walk on a raised section of beach Tuesday in the Belle Harbor section of Queens. Flood control elsewhere in the country was included in an $8.2 billion bill passed by the House Wednesday night.

      Two people walk on a raised section of beach Tuesday in the Belle Harbor section of Queens. Flood control elsewhere in the country was included in an $8.2 billion bill passed by the House Wednesday night.
    Associated Press

 
Bloomberg News

The U.S. House approved 23 commercial navigation, flood control and environmental restoration projects, work that could cost taxpayers as much as $8.2 billion over the next decade.

The vote for the measure, H.R. 3080, was 417-3. If enacted, it would be the first law authorizing dredging, levee construction and port projects since 2007.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

The bill was the first major policy legislation considered since the partisan stalemate that shut down the federal government for more than two weeks.

"This is how we ought to work," Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 House Democrat, said on the floor.

Large commercial projects that would be authorized under the legislation include dredging the Sabine-Neches Waterway, a major oil and natural gas refining area on the Texas-Louisiana border, and deepening Savannah Harbor in Georgia.

The measure won the votes of both Democrats and Tea Party- backed Republicans, who were targeted by shipping industry groups in a months-long advocacy campaign that focused on the Constitution and the importance of interstate commerce.

"It's been persuasive," Georgia Republican Jack Kingston said in an interview. "It's not some backroom sudden concept."

The measure would cap spending on the waterway projects and limit the amount of time that could be spent on required environmental reviews. It also would set up a process to revoke $12 billion previously authorized for projects now dormant.

Obama Support

The White House endorsed the bill in a statement of administration policy, though it pointed out parts of the bill it wants to be changed.

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden have repeatedly toured ports calling for passage of waterway infrastructure legislation to boost U.S. exports.

"In a couple of years, new supertankers are going to start coming through the Panama Canal," Obama said in a July tour of Jacksonville Port on the Atlantic coast of Florida. "If we want our workers and businesses to compete, then our ports have to be ready to receive those supertankers. Otherwise, they'll go to Brazil or some other place."

Lawmakers next will seek to merge the bill with a version that the Senate passed in May, S. 601.

To contact the reporter on this story: Derek Wallbank in Washington at dwallbankbloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Katherine Rizzo at krizzo5bloomberg.net

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here