Breaking News Bar
posted: 6/11/2013 5:00 AM

Larger upfront pension payments needed

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 

Debate is raging around whether the Madigan House bill or the Cullerton Senate bill is a solution to the pension problem in Illinois. In my opinion, neither one is acceptable. Both are unconstitutional. Both result in a "diminishment" of benefits as prohibited by the Illinois Constitution.

The burden of pain should fall on the pensions of the legislators and executives who have been stealing from employee pensions for decades. And while we're at it, why is the Illinois Supreme Court exempt from a reduction in its pension? The court was petitioned twice to compel the legislature to make necessary payments to the pension fund and twice refused to do so (once in the 1970s and once in the 1990s). Exempting the Supreme Court from pension reduction is, in my opinion, a not-so-subtle bribe to encourage the court to uphold the proposed unconstitutional legislative reductions of pensions.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Arguments will be made that reducing the pensions of the members of the three branches of government would not alone solve the problem of pension shortfall. No doubt, but it would at least place the pain of pension reduction on the government bodies that caused the problem and not as much on the employees who have been making the required pension payments year after year and decade after decade.

As for a solution to the problem is concerned, I favor the plan of economist Ralph Martire which calls for a larger upfront payment to the pension fund, which would result in lower, long-term affordable payments for the next several decades. This long-term solution would be a fair way to pay back the stolen pension funds. It took several decades to create this financial mess. The solution will also require such a long term repayment plan.

Joseph W. Hafenscher

Arlington Heights

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here