Breaking News Bar
posted: 6/10/2013 5:00 AM

Village must change course on ash trees

Success - Article sent! close

The village approved spending $300,000 for a flood control study but warned there are no funds for improvements.

The study will analyze the sewer system, 2011 flood and projected 10-year level storm events. What's missing is the projected loss of 13,000 ash trees that will add 28.6 million gallons of stormwater runoff yearly. Massive flooding will endure for 20-25 years until replacement trees reach maturity.

Order Reprint Print Article
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

• Why is the village spending $11.5 million to remove trees vs. $1.5-2 million to treat?

• Why is the village willing to pay $50/tree rebates to residents vs. $30/tree to treat using village staff?

• Why did the village approve funds to treat 800 trees on village property yet will not treat village-owned trees on public parkways?

• Why spend $300,000 for a flood study that will be rendered null and void with the loss of 13,000 trees?

Flooding, poor air quality, the absence of sound barriers, 10-15% decreased property values, 20-25% increased utility costs, and increased insurance premiums will have a severe long-term impact.

• Treating trees vs. removal will save approximately $9-10 million, which can be applied to sewer/flood control.

• The $1.5-2 million to treat trees in June/July is readily available in the general fund.

• Due to the drought and EAB, 500-1,000 trees of all species will be lost annually for the next few years. This will provide a moderate, natural diversification.

Mayor Hayes made the campaign promise to revisit the EAB problem. The 8/19-8/20/12 Daily Herald articles offer well-documented research. I ask the mayor to respond to my questions in Fencepost to reach all residents.

Treating trees is a necessity. These ash trees are village property and a village responsibility. The value of the entire village will be diminished. No one will buy a home in a flood-prone area, void of trees.

Treatment is urgent, it cannot wait.

Christine Sacks

Arlington Heights

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.