Breaking News Bar
posted: 5/29/2013 5:00 AM

'Creationism' is not scientific theory

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 

I felt compelled to respond to Arlene Sawicki's May 20 letter "Teach alternatives to Darwin's theories" because as a physics professor, I find Sawicki's claim that so-called intelligent design creationism is science to be laughable.

If it's science, then why hasn't any creationist ever used this idea to manufacture a vaccine or antibiotic?

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

In fact, creationism is useless for such practical matters, because -- to be blunt -- it simply doesn't work; evolutionary science does work. We use evolutionary science all the time to develop vaccines, antibiotics, assist with genetic engineering, and a whole host of other biotech and medical applications.

In fact, without modern evolutionary science, which has developed far beyond the original ideas frame by Darwin 150 years ago, we wouldn't have these medical advances. Presumably, these creationists are long on talk but pathetically short on producing actual results and applications for their so-called "science".

On another note, if Ms. Sawicki and her creationist friends want to "teach alternatives" to actual science, then will they agree to include the theory of Flying Spaghetti Monsterism (FSM), Islamic views of creationism, the creation story of Scientology, the Raelian view of intelligent design that we were created by aliens, and other "alternate" views in public school science classes? Once we accommodate all of these views, then perhaps at the end of the school year -- in the last couple of weeks -- the teachers will have time to teach some actual science.

Our competitor nations, such as China and India, don't waste time with this nonsense. If our country wishes to remain competitive in the budding biotechnology industry of the 21st century, then we need to teach our students 21st century science, not 18th century nonsense.

Matthew P. Lowry

Mundelein

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here