Daily Herald - Suburban Chicago's source for news This copy is for personal, non-commercial use. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution you can: 1) Use the "Reprint" button found on the top and bottom of every article, 2) Visit reprints.theygsgroup.com/dailyherald.asp for samples and additional information or 3) Order a reprint of this article now.
Article updated: 2/20/2013 9:54 AM

Fighting Peterson attorneys meet in court

By

The attorney who led the defense team in Drew Peterson's 2012 murder trial sat in the witness box Tuesday and faced questions from his former co-counsel -- the latest turn in a long-running legal saga full of strange twists.

The rarity of former legal colleagues facing off as adversaries came at a hearing to decide if Peterson, a former Bolingbrook police sergeant, should get a new trial in the slaying of his third wife.

His current attorneys contend that former lead attorney Joel Brodsky botched Peterson's trial, which ended in September with jurors convicting Peterson of murdering his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

Witnesses during the daylong hearing Tuesday included Brodsky, a law professor who teaches ethics and even a spectator during last year's trial. The hearing resumes today.

Peterson, 59, faces a maximum 60-year prison term for killing Savio, who was found dead in her bathtub with a gash on her head.

He gained nationwide notoriety after his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, vanished in 2007. Her disappearance led authorities to exhume Savio's body and change the cause of death from an accident to a homicide.

The dispute between Peterson's former lawyer and his current ones is in sharp contrast to the beginning of Peterson's trial, when the limelight-seeking defense team faced the media together.

The most dramatic moment at Tuesday's hearing came when current Peterson attorney Steve Greenberg announced that Brodsky was his next witness.

Brodsky at first did not appear, and eventually the judge ordered him to the witness stand.

In public, Brodsky and Greenberg have denounced each other as liars, but the back and forth in court Tuesday was comparatively polite.

Under questioning, Brodsky conceded Peterson received money for media appearances before Peterson was jailed in 2009.

Greenberg has argued Brodsky was more concerned about drumming up publicity for his legal practice than defending Peterson.

As he left, Greenberg said he didn't enjoy putting a fellow lawyer on the stand -- but added he felt compelled on Peterson's behalf.

Most experts say Peterson's chances of winning a retrial are slim.

If Judge Edward Burmila rejects the motion for a retrial, he has said he would move on quickly to Peterson's sentencing.

Glasgow told reporters Tuesday he expects a ruling Wednesday.

Copyright © 2014 Paddock Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.