Breaking News Bar
updated: 2/15/2013 9:48 AM

Filibuster or not? GOP slow-walks Hagel nomination

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., right, and Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, left, arrive for the vote to end debate on the nomination of former GOP senator Chuck Hagel as the nation's next secretary of defense, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 14, 2013.

      Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., right, and Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, left, arrive for the vote to end debate on the nomination of former GOP senator Chuck Hagel as the nation's next secretary of defense, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 14, 2013.
    Associated Press

 
Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Immediately after blocking Chuck Hagel's nomination to be secretary of defense, top Republicans took to the Senate floor to claim that, no, they were not filibustering. They just needed more time.

A filibuster occurs when a minority of senators declines to vote to invoke what's called "cloture," which sets a deadline to complete debate on a nomination or bill and forces an up or down vote. It takes 60 votes in the 100-member Senate to obtain cloture.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

By that measure, Thursday's 58-40 vote was a clear-cut filibuster. Angry Democrats said the vote to deny cloture on Hagel's nomination was a historic, first-ever successful filibuster of a Cabinet nominee and the first time the party in the Senate's minority had ever even tried the move against a defense secretary nominee.

"If this is not a filibuster, I'd like to see what a filibuster was," an angry Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said.

But Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., shot back that it was Reid who provoked Republicans into the vote by scheduling it too soon. The Armed Services Committee had just approved the nomination two days before, and Republicans were still seeking information from Hagel. They engaged in talks with top Democrats to try to lock in a vote when the Senate returns from a one-week recess.

"This is a vote by Republicans to say, `We want more than two days after this nomination comes to the floor to carefully consider it, because we have questions,"' Alexander said.

Wrong, said Democratic Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois: "There is no other way to describe what we are going through than a filibuster."

Republicans promised that enough of their members will vote to permit the former Republican senator from Nebraska's nomination to advance when the Senate returns to Washington the week of Feb. 25. And several Republicans took to the floor to deny that Thursday's vote was a filibuster and to predict that Hagel ultimately will be confirmed.

"This is not any attempt to kill this nomination," said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. "This is not a filibuster."

In the Senate, it can take just one senator to force a cloture vote, even if there's clear sentiment for an up-or-down vote. That's part of the reason why Republicans say that just because there's been a failed cloture vote, it doesn't mean there's been a filibuster.

On the other hand, several Republicans, like Sen. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, say they want to require Hagel to cross the 60-vote threshold no matter what. That undercuts the GOP argument for calling it a filibuster.

Either way, it's a rare set of circumstances. According to the Senate's historian, Donald Ritchie, just 5 percent of Cabinet nominations have been killed by the Senate or withdrawn when confirmation appeared impossible. And only twice has a Cabinet-level nominee been subject to a cloture vote. It's far more common to filibuster judicial nominees.

Ritchie says that's partly because "judicial appointments are for life, and Cabinet appointments rarely last the full length of a presidential administration."

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here