Breaking News Bar
updated: 11/7/2012 12:30 AM

Winfield voters give mixed signals on cops, roads

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 
 

Winfield voters sent a mixed message to their town leaders.

Results on Tuesday night show voters overwhelmingly supportive of keeping the village's police force. However, they oppose paying higher property taxes or having video gambling to help raise additional revenue.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

According to unofficial results from all of Winfield's 13 precincts, 87 percent of the voters approved an advisory ballot question asking if the village should keep its police department.

The nonbinding question was put on the ballot because Winfield trustees are embroiled in a debate over whether to keep the police department intact or to contract with the sheriff's office, which would save money that could be funneled toward road repairs.

But nearly 67 percent of voters rejected a binding measure that would have doubled the property tax rate homeowners pay to Winfield.

Officials said the property tax hike would have generated $850,000 to $900,000 a year, which the village planned to use to fix roads and bolster its underfunded police pension fund.

Meanwhile, a binding question will force Winfield to reinstate a ban of video gambling that the village board repealed in March. About 57 percent of voters support prohibiting video gambling, according to unofficial results.

Finally, a nonbinding question related to village spending has support. According to unofficial results, 82 percent of voters would like to see the village seek voter permission to spend more than $1 million on a new project in a single year.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.