Breaking News Bar
updated: 9/21/2012 4:40 PM

Jim Oberweis: Candidate Profile

25th District Senate (Republican)

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Jim Oberweis, running for 25th District Senate

      Jim Oberweis, running for 25th District Senate

 

 

 

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Note: Answers provided have not been edited for grammar, misspellings or typos. In some instances, candidate claims that could not be immediately verified have been omitted.

Jump to:

BioKey IssuesQ&A

 

Bio

City: Sugar Grove

Website: jimoberweis.com

Office sought: 25th District Senate

Age: 66

Family: Married, 5 children, 2 step children, 17 grandchildren

Occupation: Chairman, Oberweis Dairy President, Oberweis Foundation

Education: Marmion Military Academy University of Illinois, BS University of Chicago, MBA

Civic involvement: Aurora Evening Lions Club (no longer active) Northern Ill. Food Bank Board Moose Int'l

Elected offices held: Illinois Republican State Central Committee, 2010-present Prestbury Community Association

Have you ever been arrested for or convicted of a crime? If yes, please explain: No

Candidate's Key Issues

Key Issue 1

Making Illinois more business friendly in order to create more jobs for Illinois residents

Key Issue 2

Bringing fiscal responsibility back to the Illinois budget, including pension reform, Medicaid reform, and workman's comp. reform.

Key Issue 3

Returning control of our state to our voters through term limits, voter IDs, and reducing gerrymandering.

Questions & Answers

How would you fix the state's pension gap? Should pension costs be shifted to suburban school districts? Why or why not? Should this issue be voted on in a lame-duck session? Why or why not? How can partisan gridlock be eased to solve the crisis?

Ultimately, we need to move new employees to a defined contribution system,(such as a 401k plan) which will make benefits portable for employees and eliminate future unfunded pension liabilities. The more difficult question is, how do we deal with current employees and current retirees? I have some ideas, and Rep. Mike Fortner has put forth a reasonable plan. I don't think there is just one answer, but this must be dealt with ASAP because the liability is contuing to grow every day.

How, specifically, would you cut the budget? What does Illinois need to do to fix its status as a "deadbeat state?" How will you vote on future gambling bills? What is your view of slots at racetracks? Casino expansion?

Any cuts require very difficult choices but we must make significant cuts. We cannot continue to spend at this level any longer. I would reduce the number of state senators to 54, allocated 3 to each of our 18 Congressional District, both to save money and to reduce gerrymandering. Similarly, i would reduce the number of state representatives to 108, two to each senate district as we do now. Secondly, I would get rid of duplicate services, by, for instance, combining the Treasure's office and the Comptroller's office. Illinois must become a more business friendly state to keep companies in Illinois and encourage entrepreneurs to start new businesses in Illinois, creating more jobs and opportunities for Illinois residents. This will help to reduce unemployment costs. Clearly, we must get pension and Medicaid costs under control. I do not believe that gambling is a good long term source of funds to finance our state. However, we do already have gambling in the state and I lean toward allowing slots at racetracks since they are already gambling locations. Slots at tracks would help keep our track industry competitve with other states. I don't think government should be in the business of picking winners and losers. We should also not make large payments of taxpayer dollars to politcally connected companies to get them to stay in Illinois. We should make our state friendly to all legitimate businesses.

What can you do specifically to help the economy in your district? How can you help create jobs in your district and statewide? What is your view of the tax breaks granted to companies like Motorola Mobility, Navistar and Sears?

As I stated above, we should not be providing special tax breaks and incentives to connected companies. We should create an environment friendly to all. I am not going to Springfield to get more pork for our district. I'm going to Springfield to try to improve the business climate for the entire state.

Do you favor limiting how much money party leaders can give candidates during an election? If elected, do you plan to vote for the current leader of your caucus? Why or why not? Do you support or oppose campaign contribution limits? Please explain.

i tend to lean towards allowing equal contribution limits for all, or perhaps, even no limits WITH FULL AND IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE OF ALL CONTRIBUTIONS over a threashold of $500 or $1000. Too much power is concentrated in a few hands when only party leadership can make large contributions. There are lots of great Republican leaders in the Illinois Senate. I will wait until I know who the candidates are before deciding who I believe will be our best leader.

Should gay marriage be legalized in Illinois? Should it be voted on in a lame-duck session as civil unions were? Should Illinois define life as beginning at conception? How would you vote on a concealed carry plan? Should the death penalty return?

I believe traditional marriage defines a relationship between one man and one woman. I believe life begins at conception. I support concealed carry with reasonable restrictions. The death penalty should be allowed if, and only if, it can be demonstrated that the death penalty deters serious crime.

Share this page
    help here