Breaking News Bar
posted: 6/23/2012 7:55 AM

County officials consider options for judicial center overflow

Success - Article sent! close

A $100 million price tag is what ended the last Kane County Board debate about expanding an increasingly cramped judicial center, but the growing pains haven't subsided.

County officials are ready to discuss less costly options for a sizable construction plan that would be one of the first major votes new county board members will take after the November election.

Order Reprint Print Article
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

A county board task force on Friday agreed to secure price tags for several options.

The first involves adding two wings to the judicial center as originally envisioned, which is estimated to cost about $100 million.

The second idea involves moving the court services staff to the circuit court clerk offices on Randall Road in St. Charles making the old offices at the judicial center courtrooms.

The third option is increasing use of the old Third Street Courthouse in Geneva. That also may prove to be a costly option -- building a parking structure would likely be needed.

The fourth option involves adding a second courtroom to the Juvenile Justice Center building; however, more space for juvenile cases isn't the county's main problem. A mix of court cases in that facility may not be desirable, officials said.

Finally, the latest idea, and the one most officials seem to favor, is adding more courtrooms to the circuit court clerk's building. The county recently moved traffic court to the facility. This plan likely would move divorce and child support cases. An early estimate for this option is about $5 million.

County officials must still agree on where to find the money for any sort of judicial construction project. An initial plan would see the money coming from the county's public safety sales tax, but that plan might create a tug-of-war for funding with the circuit court clerk's office.

The recent court settlement between the county board and Circuit Court Clerk Deb Seyller forced Seyller to spend down her special revenue funds to meet payroll. Now those special funds are beginning to run low, and some board members see the public safety sales tax as a way to beef up the circuit court clerk's budget. Doing that might not leave enough cash for the construction project.

There's an additional idea that will also see some discussion: Several county board members would like to make better round-the-clock use of the existing judicial center by creating a night court. But judicial employees, including Chief Judge Robert Spence, have repeatedly rebuffed that idea as a logistical nightmare.

The task force will weigh all those options once getting some cost estimates for each idea.

Options: Judicial employees say night court would be a 'logistical nightmare'

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here