Where are the compassionate conservatives?
We heard plenty of contradictions, distortions and untruths at the Republican candidates' tea party debate, but we heard shockingly little compassion — and almost no acknowledgment that political and economic policy choices have a moral dimension.
The lowest point of the evening — and perhaps of the political season — came when moderator Wolf Blitzer asked Ron Paul a hypothetical question about a young man who elects not to purchase health insurance. The man has a medical crisis, goes into a coma and needs expensive care. “Who pays?” Blitzer asked.
“That's what freedom is all about, taking your own risks,” Paul answered. “This whole idea that you have to prepare and take care of everybody ... “
Blitzer interrupted: “But Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die?”
There were enthusiastic shouts of “Yeah!” from the crowd. You'd think one of the other candidates might jump in with a word about Christian kindness. Not a peep.
Paul, a physician, went on to say that, no, the hypothetical comatose man should not be allowed to die. But in Paul's vision of America, “our neighbors, our friends, our churches” would choose to assume the man's care — with government bearing no responsibility and playing no role.
Blitzer turned to Michele Bachmann, whose popularity with Evangelical Christian voters stems, at least in part, from her own professed born-again faith. Asked what she would do about the man in the coma, Bachmann ignored the question and launched into a canned explanation of why she wants to repeal President Obama's Affordable Care Act.
According to the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus told the pharisees that God commands us to “love thy neighbor as thyself.” There is no asterisk making this obligation null and void if circumstances require its fulfillment via government.
The thing is, Bachmann knows a lot about compassion. She makes much of the fact that she and her husband took in 23 foster children over the years. But what of the orphaned or troubled children who are not lucky enough to find a wealthy family to take them in? Government can reach them. But according to today's Republican dogma, it must not.
Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Bachmann, Paul and the others in Tampa all had the same prescription for the economy: Cut spending, cut taxes and let the wealth that results trickle down to the less fortunate.
Government is more than a machine for collecting and spending money, more than an instrument of war, a book of laws or a shield to guarantee and protect individual rights. Government is also an expression of our collective values and aspirations. There's a reason the Constitution begins “We the people ...” rather than “We the unconnected individuals who couldn't care less about one another ...”
There was a fascinating moment in the debate when Perry defended Texas legislation that allows children of illegal immigrants to pay in-state tuition at state universities. The other candidates bashed him with anti-immigrant rhetoric until the evening's only glimmer of moral responsibility was snuffed out.
© 2011, Washington Post Writers Group