Transparency raised as issue in Libertyville mayoral rematch
In 2009, Terry Weppler convincingly ousted incumbent Jeff Harger in Libertyville's first contested mayoral race in 20 years.
Citing dissatisfaction with village officials in his campaign, Weppler and three running mates for trustee swept incumbents out of office. All were unopposed four years later and elected to second terms.
This year it is Harger who says village leadership is not in touch with the community. He has returned for a rematch for the village's top elected post.
Information regarding the candidates came from interviews, comments and questionnaires.
While Harger cites a lack of transparency, Weppler counters that information is available and public input on various matters has been sought and welcomed.
"My issues aren't about dollars and cents, my issues are with communication with the community. There's a feeling everything is a done deal in this town," Harger said.
"Plans are never a rubber stamp in this community," said Weppler, who recently retired from his law practice. He also served on the village board from 1979 to 1985.
Harger owns a lightning protection business and was a village trustee for eight years before being elected mayor. He has been visible and vocal in recent months regarding a proposed residential development at Butterfield Road and Lake Street that has drawn large turnouts for public hearings.
He says those who encouraged him to run feel "a few individuals" control everything and there is a lack of transparency.
"If people are thinking this, then there obviously is an issue," he said.
The review process doesn't need to change but village leadership "needs to learn how to say no to these developments and listen to the community at large," Harger added.
Weppler said the village can't prohibit a property owner from making a proposal but people don't necessarily understand the ensuing process that includes a public review by an advisory commission and conditions that have to be met.
As for zoning issues, Weppler says notice provisions have been changed to ensure residents are aware of pending projects. He cited the use of public town hall sessions in some instances to disseminate and solicit information, adding that public participation involving proposed development is beneficial.
"What our residents have been saying is that they don't like the proposed plans presented by developers," Weppler said.
"By having a public hearing process, our residents help us change the development plans to better meet the expectations of our residents," he added.