advertisement

Publishing Clinton story promoted falsehood

To run Ken Dilanian's article about experts not seeing any criminal violations in Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information is a disservice to journalism.

In Dilanian's own writing, paragraph 7, he quotes expert Leslie McAdoo as saying "a case would be possible if material emerges that is so sensitive Clinton must have known it was highly classified, whether marked or not".

Given that 100 percent of Hillary's information handling was done on an off-the-grid system, the probability then becomes 100 percent that some was Top Secret.

Otherwise, the writer is making an argument that, for the first time in the nation's history, a secretary of state never handled classified information in four years. And that, my friends, is preposterous.

Giving this article full second-page status makes the Herald complicit in promoting this false narrative.

Lyle Rapp

Elk Grove Village

Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.