Remember Squeezy the Pension Python? Events from 2012 to Supreme Court decision

  • Squeezy the Pension Python was a small part of a large effort behind the pension law that was struck down Friday.

    Squeezy the Pension Python was a small part of a large effort behind the pension law that was struck down Friday. Screenshot

Updated 5/8/2015 5:17 PM

Squeezy the Pension Python is dead.

The orange, cartoon snake debuted in a 2012 Internet video commissioned by Gov. Pat Quinn in an effort to explain Illinois' mind-numbingly complicated pension debt.


Squeezy wrapped tightly around a photo of the Capitol dome, causing it to bulge. It was Quinn's attempt to illustrate the squeeze rising pension costs put on the state budget.

Squeezy didn't change a lot of lawmakers' votes, but his brief moment as a YouTube star marked one moment in the effort that dominated state politics for a few years and led to the 2013 law that the Illinois Supreme Court overturned Friday.

Here are some other key events in the long road to Friday's court decision.

• Right around the time Squeezy debuted, state Sen. Daniel Biss, an Evanston Democrat, was driving home from a 2012 legislative session that produced no action on a pension proposal when he fielded phone calls from frustrated lawmakers. The legislation he and state Rep. Elaine Nekritz, a Northbrook Democrat, later filed would become the source material for the 2013 law.

• Despite the hype, lawmakers left Springfield in 2013 without sending a pension proposal to Quinn, who had proposed his own plan.

• A few months later, Quinn cut lawmakers' pay in a budget maneuver. "They must have that alarm bell ringing in their ears and the best way to do that is to hit them in the wallet," he said.

by signing up you agree to our terms of service

• Shortly after Thanksgiving of 2013, lawmakers struck a deal on the law that would eventually find its way to the Supreme Court. The move gave Quinn something to brag about on the 2014 campaign trail. Then-candidate Bruce Rauner worked against the plan behind the scenes.

• Late last year, a Sangamon County judge sided with union leaders who had sued to stop the law, arguing it was unconstitutional. That set up an appeal directly to the Illinois Supreme Court.

• On Friday, the Supreme Court agreed. Because the law was put on ice while the court process took place, no pension benefits were cut by a single dollar, despite the massive political energy put behind the effort. The Supreme Court's opinion didn't waffle: "Adherence to constitutional requirements often requires significant sacrifice, but our survival as a society depends on it."

Article Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.