Articles filed under Navarrette, Rueben

Show 21-40 of 100 « previous next »
  • The saga of the border kids Jun 24, 2014 5:01 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: Americans are trying to get a handle on the border kids — and what President Obama has called an “urgent humanitarian situation” along the U.S.-Mexico border. Americans want to know why, according to U.S. immigration officials, more than 47,000 young people — most of them from Central America — have streamed across the U.S.-Mexico border in the last eight months.

  • The value of a push May 29, 2014 5:01 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: A little girl can break her daddy’s heart with one question. A few days ago, my 9-year-old daughter — noticing I was in a suit and not my usual, casual attire — asked me where I was going, and I told her. I had been invited to judge a high school debate competition. She asked what that was all about, and I told her it is where two teams square off and make well-constructed arguments, trying to convince a judge of their point of view. She asked, “Can girls do that?”

  • Pay attention to Venezuela Mar 9, 2014 5:01 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: When people are brave enough to stand up for freedom against repressive governments intent on maintaining their grip on power, the process is usually messy — and often bloody. In Venezuela, for the last few weeks, blood has stained the streets of Caracas and other major cities.

  • Mexicans’ skepticism fuels legend of El Chapo Mar 4, 2014 5:01 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: Before we talk of extradition, shouldn’t we make sure that the man in custody in Mexico is really Joaquin Guzman? A lot of Mexicans don’t believe he is.

  • Taking on the Latino barriers in Hollywood Dec 24, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: Given what he does for a living, it is no surprise that Rick Najera’s memoir about being a Latino breaking down barriers in Hollywood reads like a good movie.

  • Fulfilling one DREAM Dec 2, 2013 1:57 PM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: When you talk to DREAMers — those undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States by their parents — what you hear most often is that they just want to get on with their lives. These young people are in the legal version of a black hole. But unlike many of those who choose to come here illegally, they can’t find their way home. Because this is home.

  • Arne Duncan’s moment of truth Dec 1, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: When we talk about improving public education in America, should we mention race and ethnicity? Here’s a better question: If we’re honest about one of the biggest problems — i.e., the low expectations that many educators have of some students that become a self-fulfilling prophesy — how can we avoid the topic?

  • CBS too quick to retract Nov 13, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: "60 Minutes" reporters and producers at the venerable CBS newsmagazine made mistakes in putting together a story about last year’s attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Libya — and the story has been retracted. But they also got a few things right, highlighting important information that raises serious questions about whether the attack could have been predicted and prevented.

  • Hispanics now sit squarely in a difficult conversation Jul 24, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: Now that the George Zimmerman murder trial is over, let’s hope we’ve heard the last of the awkward term “white Hispanic.” For the most part, it is a media concoction that has only served to stir resentment from both whites and Hispanics. Welcome to multicultural America, circa 2013, where you can’t tell the players without a program.

  • The egg on Heritage’s face May 28, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: What's the point of building bridges between Latinos and the Republican Party if one of the nation's leading conservative think tanks is going to blow them up?

  • Cruz finds redemption May 22, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarette: A couple of weeks ago, in a partisan jab, former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson (a Democrat) accused Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (a Republican) of being “anti-immigration.” This was an odd accusation to level at someone whose personal hero is his father, Rafael, who immigrated to the United States from Cuba in 1957.

  • Tequila, with love May 2, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette Jr.: For Cinco de Mayo this year, I recommend a tequila that lets you savor a son's love for his father. The liquor will fill your glass. But the story behind it will fill your soul.

  • Testing the will of the people Apr 1, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: When I listen to conservatives and liberals stake out their respective positions on gay marriage, I have to wonder if they're listening to themselves talk.

  • Hispanic Republicans walk a fine line Jan 24, 2013 9:14 AM
    When you’re a Hispanic Republican, the immigration debate comes with both obstacles and opportunities. This is true with two lawmakers who are among the most important people to watch in the debate that is about to play out in Congress: Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas. These rising superstars in the GOP need to find the sweet spot on immigration, where they could get something done without getting done in. First, there are the obstacles. The media will often play “gotcha” and try to trap Rubio and Cruz between reaching out to Latinos and toeing a party line on immigration that so far has repelled Latinos. Both the right and the left will view them with suspicion. Latinos will see them as trying to please Republicans, while Republicans will suspect that their true allegiance lies with other Latinos. Both sides will wait for them to disappoint, and they will immediately pounce when that happens. Just ask Rubio. Last year, when President Obama offered deferred action to undocumented students brought here by their parents, Rubio called it a good first step. A conservative radio talk show host in San Diego who is known for anti-immigrant rants declared: “That’s it, I’m done with Rubio.” But Rubio isn’t done with immigration. He plans to introduce a bill that gives illegal immigrants a path to legal status without citizenship — and perhaps offer the citizenship option to undocumented students. Still, for Hispanic Republicans, being targeted comes with the territory. And since they’ve been put on the defensive, it’s hard for them to find a nuanced and thoughtful approach to immigration. And there is the opportunity. At the moment, the newly sworn-in Cruz is doing what Rubio did in his first two years in the Senate — trying to keep immigration at arm’s length. It didn’t work for Rubio, and it won’t work for Cruz. The Republican Party is counting on both these leaders to help it mend fences with Latino voters, and that road goes right through the immigration debate. There is no detour. In a recent interview, Cruz told me that — for him and his family — the issue is personal. His father, Rafael, left Cuba before Fidel Castro came to power. “We need to remain a nation that doesn’t just welcome but that celebrates legal immigrants who come here seeking to pursue the American dream,” he said. “All across the state of Texas, I have told my father’s story thousands of times. My dad has been my hero my entire life. But what I find most extraordinary about his story is how commonplace it is. Every one of us — whether it’s us, or our parents, or our grandparents, or our great-grandparents — we all are the children of those who fled oppression seeking freedom. I think that’s the most fundamental DNA of what it means to be an American — to value freedom and opportunity above everything else.” For Cruz, step one is “securing the border,” but he thinks that both parties are too busy trying to demagogue the issue to get even this done. Still, he seems to understand the curious paradox of America — a country of immigrants that, truth be told, has often been hostile to newer immigrants. “Resistance to immigrants is not a new phenomenon,” Cruz said. “It’s been present in the United States, and present everywhere really, for centuries. You go back 100 years, and go to the New York City, and you’d see signs in restaurants that said: ‘No Irish and No Dogs.’ Then you had a big immigration wave from Ireland, and there was the same sense of fear that we sometimes see manifested here.” Indeed, it’s all about fear. We don’t just need new laws. We also need a new mindset. Americans can’t fix the immigration system until they overcome their fear of immigrants. On the left, organized labor has an economic fear that immigrants take jobs and lower wages. On the right, nativists have a cultural fear that immigrants don’t assimilate and expect Americans to lose their language and national identity. That’s the power of immigrants — bridging the political divide one scary story at a time. Rubio and Cruz have their work cut out for them. But, I suspect, they also have a lot to offer. Let’s see it. Ruben Navarrette’s email address is © 2013, The Washington Post Writers Group

  • The balancing act of parenting Jan 14, 2013 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: I often describe it as my most important job. It’s the one that is the most difficult, and yet the most fulfilling. The job is being a parent to my three young children — ages 3, 5 and 7. And in 2013, my resolution is to do it better.

  • Scholarships for illegal immigrants Dec 31, 2012 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette Jr.: When it comes to how California handles illegal immigrants, the state is all over the map. Not unlike the rest of the country, the Golden State can't decide whether it wants to make life comfortable for the undocumented or make them so unhappy that it runs them off.

  • Democrats’ hypocrisy toward blacks Dec 31, 2012 6:10 PM
    African-American Republicans catch a lot of flak, but they can also be an illuminating force in the American political system. The reaction they often generate shows that liberals aren’t as progressive as they pretend to be. The left will not hesitate to come after anyone who threatens to weaken its hold on black voters. The reaction also shows that many African-American activists aren’t completely sincere about wanting the community to achieve political power and break barriers. In the end, the only people they want to see arrive at positions of influence are those beholden to the Democratic Party. The same is true with Hispanics, where most of the activists on the left are Democrats first and Hispanics second. They tend to put their party before their community, often with disastrous results. In the African-American community, black Republicans are regarded with suspicion. The few African-Americans who aren’t Democrats are considered unrepresentative and out of step. In this year’s presidential election, President Obama got 93 percent of the African-American vote. It’s tempting to treat the 6 percent of black voters who supported Romney as an anomaly. As evidence, consider the nasty treatment that Rep. Tim Scott, R-S.C., is receiving after South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley announced recently that she would name him to replace retiring Sen. Jim DeMint, who is leaving to run the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The appointment is a big deal. Scott will become the first black senator from the South since Reconstruction and, at present, the only African-American in the Senate from either party. Not bad for someone raised in poverty by a single mother. This is an American success story. It’s what progress looks like. So are those on the left celebrating? Of course not. If Scott were a Democrat, they would be raising champagne glasses. The activists would label his arrival in the Senate a historic event, and the media would run stories about how African-Americans in the South are gaining political prominence. But since Scott is a Republican, the left sees nothing positive in this appointment. In fact, Scott becomes a target — just like Hispanic Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and GOP Sen.-elect Ted Cruz of Texas. The goal will be to discredit Scott as an intellectual lightweight, a religious zealot, a right-wing extremist or all of the above. The offensive — and that is the right word for it — has already started. In a snarky op-ed in The New York Times, Adolph L. Reed Jr., a political science professor at the University of Pennsylvania, dismissed Scott as a “token” put up by the Republican Party to camouflage its hostility to African-Americans and other minorities. “I suspect that appointments like Mr. Scott’s are directed less at blacks — whom they know they aren’t going to win in any significant numbers — than at whites who are inclined to vote Republican but don’t want to have to think of themselves, or be thought of by others, as racist,” Reed wrote. “Just as white Southern Democrats once used cynical manipulations — poll taxes, grandfather clauses, literacy tests — to get around the 15th Amendment, so modern-day Republicans have deployed blacks to undermine black interests.” Really? Isn’t it clear to just about everyone by now that what undermines “black interests” -- in the realm of politics — is the fact that African-Americans are taken for granted by Democrats and written off by Republicans? It’s undeniable that Obama inspires pride within that community. But even he has come under fire from some on the left, who are upset over his lack of attention to issues such as urban violence, neglected neighborhoods, and an unemployment rate among African-American youth that hovers around 30 percent. Besides, the GOP has broken its share of racial barriers. The only two African-Americans to serve as secretary of state — Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice — were nominated by a Republican, George W. Bush. Why didn’t Democratic presidents break that barrier when they had the chance? That raises a broader question. Why haven’t Democrats done more in recent years to improve the condition of African-Americans and other minorities? It’s not enough to attack black Republicans as inauthentic or inadequate. Democrats have to show that they still merit the backing of some of their most loyal constituencies. If they can’t do that, then they no longer deserve the support. Ruben Navarrette’s email address is © 2012, The Washington Post Writers Group

  • Whiner in chief Nov 26, 2012 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: We mustn't confuse those "gifts" with the giveaways that Republicans hand out after they win elections — from farm subsidies to tax cuts to increases in defense spending. This is totally different.

  • Mexico’s own immigration debate Nov 20, 2012 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: The immigration debate in Mexico is also dishonest and hypocritical and filled with people who would rather pursue their own interests than solve the problem. And it all revolves around a broken system that stays broken because important and powerful interests want it that way.

  • Give back to Mexico — for what? Nov 16, 2012 5:00 AM
    Columnist Ruben Navarrette: Mexican officials want to enlist Mexican-Americans to help give Mexico a makeover. The relationship is still an open wound, and yet they expect us — the children and grandchildren of the throwaways — to open our wallets. That's not going to happen, amigos.

Show 21-40 of 100 « previous next »
Latest Video


Most Commented
Top Jobs

    View all Top Jobs Place a job ad



    Connect with a business or service in your area fast. First select a town, then enter a search term or choose one of the listed popular searches:

    Don't see your town listed? Visit our full directory to begin your search.