Breaking News Bar
posted: 9/5/2014 12:01 AM

A policy switch at FHA will end unfair fee

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 
 

WASHINGTON -- Hundreds of thousands of home sellers have had their pockets picked at closings during the last decade; they've been charged interest on their mortgages after their principal debts had been fully paid off.

This practice, endorsed by a federal agency, cost homeowners staggering amounts, with estimates ranging into the hundreds of millions of dollars a year during periods when mortgage rates were high.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

But thanks to a policy switch made final last week, charging extra interest payments on loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration will soon be banned.

FHA, which traditionally has served as a major source of financing for moderate-income, first-time buyers -- many of them African-American and Latino, for years has allowed lenders to charge borrowers a full month of interest when they sell or refinance a home. This has been the case even when borrowers pay off the mortgage weeks in advance of the end of the month.

Picture this. Say you went to closing on an FHA loan Sept. 3. Under standard industry rules followed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Department of Veterans Affairs, your interest charges cannot extend beyond that date. But under FHA's long-standing policy, lenders have been allowed to hit you with interest charges through Sept. 30.

Why? Good question.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau essentially posed it to FHA last year: Aren't you allowing lenders to soak hapless consumers with post-payment penalties at closings when they have no alternative but to pay up? And, more to the point, didn't the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation of 2010 prohibit penalties of this sort? How is your policy, which sometimes results in unexpected extra charges of hundreds of dollars, legal?

FHA argued that the bond investors who buy packages of insured mortgages expect full-month payments of interest plus principal, and that in any event, FHA lenders charge borrowers slightly below market rates to help compensate for the post-closing payments. But critics said there was no way this alleged bargain favored borrowers, who inevitably paid far more in extended interest than they ever received in hairsplitting "reduced" interest rates.

The National Association of Realtors, which had railed against FHA's policy for more than a decade, estimated that during 2003 alone, sellers and refinancers were forced to pay nearly $690 million in extra interest charges. Realtors in Maryland even persuaded Sen. Ben Cardin, a Democrat and ally of the Obama administration, to introduce legislation that would have prohibited the extra interest fees. But FHA didn't like the bill and it died without getting even a hearing in the Senate.

Asked for comment on FHA's policy change, Realtors association President Steve Brown said he applauded the move, which was "long overdue" and should "result in cost savings for millions of Americans who rely on FHA-insured loans to purchase their homes."

Here are the details of the policy reform: Starting Jan. 21, new FHA mortgages will require lenders to collect interest only on the balance remaining on the date of closing for a home sale or refinancing. Under the revised policy, if you're selling your home and you have a $150,000 balance left on your FHA loan, the lender will have to stop charging you interest on the date of the closing, not compute the interest charges that would be due through the end of the month and roll them into your bottom line.

In guidance published in the Federal Register, FHA urged lenders not to find new ways to penalize borrowers. The agency said they should "look elsewhere" to recoup whatever revenues they expect to lose by virtue of the policy change, and continue "to offer consumers the same interest rates that they offer now," rather than finding some way to tack on a premium.

So could these changes make FHA more attractive to borrowers compared with the alternatives? Yes, but there are two caveats: Sellers and refinancers who currently have FHA loans and expect to close before Jan. 21 won't likely see much benefit. Plus FHA's other current negatives -- super-high mortgage insurance premiums that are non-cancellable for extended periods -- won't be disappearing.

Nonetheless, FHA remains the go-to choice if you have minimal down payment cash (3.5 percent), issues in your credit files and you are not eligible for a VA loan, which is the best deal around with zero down and generous underwriting.

• Write to Ken Harney at P.O. Box 15281, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 or via email at kenharney@earthlink.net.

© 2014, Washington Post Writers Group

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here