Breaking News Bar
updated: 7/17/2014 12:03 AM

Blagojevich files new argument in appeal

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • In this March 2012 photo, former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich waves as he departs his Chicago home for Littleton, Colo., to begin his 14-year prison sentence on corruption charges. Blagojevich's lawyers submitted an additional argument on why an appeals court in Chicago should overturn the imprisoned former governor's convictions Wednesday in Chicago. The two-page filing with the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals refers to an April Supreme Court decision striking down laws that restrict aggregate limits on campaign contributions.

      In this March 2012 photo, former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich waves as he departs his Chicago home for Littleton, Colo., to begin his 14-year prison sentence on corruption charges. Blagojevich's lawyers submitted an additional argument on why an appeals court in Chicago should overturn the imprisoned former governor's convictions Wednesday in Chicago. The two-page filing with the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals refers to an April Supreme Court decision striking down laws that restrict aggregate limits on campaign contributions.
    Associated Press

 
Associated Press

Lawyers for imprisoned former Gov. Rod Blagojevich submitted an additional argument Wednesday to the federal court that's considering his appeal, saying a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision bolsters their contention that the Illinois Democrat never crossed the line from legal political horse trading into corruption.

Blagojevich, 57, is in his second year behind bars in a federal prison in Colorado serving a 14-year prison sentence for political corruption -- including for seeking to sell or trade an appointment to President Barack Obama's vacated U.S. Senate seat in exchange for campaign contributions or a well-paying job.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

The filing with the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago cites a decision by the nation's highest court in April. In that case, McCutcheon v. the Federal Election Commission, the court said soliciting contributions is corruption when a politician makes explicit promises to take official action for a donation.

That's something Blagojevich did not do, his attorneys say.

"The McCutcheon decision thus supports Blagojevich's position that, where a criminal prosecution is based upon attempts to solicit campaign contributions, the government must prove a quid pro quo or explicit promise," the two-page filing says. Federal prosecutors, it contends, failed to show Blagojevich did any such thing.

The Supreme Court's higher profile and most controversial finding in McCutcheon case was that laws restricting aggregate limits on campaign contributions were unconstitutional because they violate First Amendment protections of free speech.

Blagojevich's attorneys filed their appeal one year ago, and the sides held oral arguments before a three-judge panel in Chicago in December. Going more than six months without a decision on an appeal is unusual, though it is impossible to say if the lengthy consideration bodes well for Blagojevich or for prosecutors.

Prosecutors are likely to file a response to Wednesday's defense filing, though they aren't required to. A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Chicago, Randall Samborn, declined any comment.

The panel's hard-hitting questions for a Blagojevich prosecutor during oral arguments raised defense hopes that some convictions could be thrown out. The questions' focus: Exactly where is the line between legal and illegal political wheeling and dealing? And did Blagojevich cross it?

At one point, Judge Frank Easterbrook noted how exceptional the prosecution of Blagojevich was. He even compared Blagojevich's bid to land a Cabinet seat to how President Dwight Eisenhower named Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court after Warren offered Eisenhower key political support during the 1952 campaign.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here