Breaking News Bar
posted: 7/5/2014 8:01 AM

Where the Wheaton College ruling could lead

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Wheaton College objects to filling out a form authorizing a third party to provide contraception coverage to employees. A Supreme Court decision allows the school to simply write a letter stating the objections, and experts say that could embolden other religious nonprofits to file objections.

       Wheaton College objects to filling out a form authorizing a third party to provide contraception coverage to employees. A Supreme Court decision allows the school to simply write a letter stating the objections, and experts say that could embolden other religious nonprofits to file objections.
    Scott Sanders | Staff Photographer

 
The Washington Post

WASHINGTON -- With much of Washington already gone for the holiday, the Supreme Court issued a short legal ruling Thursday with the potential to deepen the political backlash among Democrats sparked by the court's earlier Hobby Lobby decision.

The majority of the justices ruled that Wheaton College does not for now have to comply with the Obama administration's requirement that it fill out a form to register religious objections to providing some types of contraceptive coverage mandated by the Affordable Care Act.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

The opinion said that until full arguments are heard by the court, Wheaton need only file a letter with the federal government stating the college's religious objections.

Legal experts say that temporary decision is likely to embolden religious groups and lead to a new wave of lawsuits and objections to the required form.

"I certainly think you will see more objections from religious nonprofits ... and perhaps more interlocutory orders like this one," said Paul Horwitz, a constitutional law scholar at the University of Alabama law school.

The injunction prompted a sharp rebuke from the court's three female justices, who took the ruling -- which does not mean that the court will ultimately side with the school -- as reneging on the logic expressed by the majority of the court in the Hobby Lobby case.

In that decision, issued Monday, the court determined that the chain of craft stores does not have to pay for insurance for forms of contraception it deems immoral -- in part because the chain didn't have a reasonable alternative such as filing the form that Wheaton College objects to. That option was not provided to the craft-store chain.

But some colleges and religious organizations say that signing the form authorizes third parties to provide contraceptive coverage, which, they say, still makes them complicit in actions that offend their religious beliefs.

What remains to be seen is whether the decision to allow Wheaton College to operate outside of the mandate will further outrage women's groups on the left, who are already likely to play a significant role in the 2014 midterm elections.

Democrats have crafted much of their strategy in 2014 -- a midterm year in which securing a House majority seems improbable and they may lose control of the Senate -- around the imperative of turning out women voters, especially unmarried women.

Strategists on both sides of the aisle agree that the "war on women" narrative has historically played well for Democrats.

Within hours of the Hobby Lobby decision, progressive and left-leaning groups that focus on women's issues such as Planned Parenthood and EMILY's List were using it for midterm fundraising.

On the right, the Hobby Lobby decision galvanized groups that saw it as an opportunity to file many more lawsuits, such as Wheaton's.

"The unfair (Health and Human Services) mandate gave family businesses two nonchoices: Either violate your deeply held moral beliefs and comply by paying for drugs and services to which you object, or pay crippling fines of up to $100 per day, per employee, for noncompliance," said Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council, an evangelical group, after the Hobby Lobby decision was announced. He went on to add:

"It is our hope that lower courts will follow the Supreme Court's lead and protect nonprofits like Little Sisters of the Poor, Priests for Life and Wheaton College from the unfair HHS mandate."

That could keep the battle over the contraception requirement in the headlines and in the minds of voters deep into the summer.

Legal experts cautioned on Friday that the injunction issued by the court does not signal that it will ultimately rule in favor of the school -- or in favor of other schools and institutions in similar cases.

"It was crucial to the majority's position in Hobby Lobby that the government had already established that there was a less restrictive alternative. It certainly looked like they found that to be a perfectly good option," said Brian Leiter, director of the University of Chicago's Center for Law, Philosophy, and Human Values.

"So, if the question is what are they going to do when they actually hear this case, the logic of Hobby Lobby would suggest that Wheaton will lose."

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here