Breaking News Bar
updated: 5/5/2014 7:11 PM

Letter: Drop perjury charge against witness

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 
Associated Press

Several prominent lawyers and jurists are asking Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez to drop perjury charges against a witness who claims he lied when he helped secure convictions at a murder trial 20 years ago.

In a letter to Alvarez, the judges and prosecutors argue that prosecuting 42-year-old Willie Johnson could dissuade others who gave false testimony from recanting.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Among those who signed the letter were former U.S. attorneys Dan Webb and Jim Thompson, who is also a former Illinois governor; former Illinois Attorney General Tyrone Fahner; former Kane County State's Attorney Gary Johnson; former federal appeals judge Abner Mikva; former U.S. District Judge George Leighton and author Scott Turow.

At a 1994 trial, Johnson identified two men as gunmen in a fatal shooting. In 2011, he told a judge he'd lied. But after the judge said he didn't believe Johnson did really lie, Alvarez charged him.

Johnson's attorney, Steve Greenberg, says recanting witnesses who hurt a state case are more likely to be charged with perjury than witnesses who lie to help the state.

"I understand why the law is written the way it is in theory, but the state's attorney has to be careful about how it is applied," said Greenberg, who is representing Johnson for free.

Cook County state's attorney spokeswoman Sally Daly told the Chicago Sun-Times the perjury case against Johnson is being "prosecuted in good faith."

"The office pursues perjury in very limited circumstances and only when it is appropriate to do so," Daly said. "We would never charge cases to deter truthful testimony. Lying under oath in an effort to falsely exculpate a convicted criminal should, however, be deterred."

However, in an April 24 letter, 23 attorneys said they believe the prosecution of Johnson is not in the interest of justice.

"Mr. Johnson's conviction would chill future witness recantations, thereby depriving those who stand convicted of crimes they may not have committed of a fair opportunity to obtain post-conviction relief," the letter said.

Although the letter signers acknowledge Johnson must have been lying either at the 1994 trial or in the 2011 post-conviction hearing, they said perjury charges should be pursued only when prosecutors believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the recantation was false.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here