The irony of crying 'amateur'

This is in response to a letter from Tom Klingner in the April 22 edition.

I find it amusing that people would take offense about a published article that criticizes a favored politician for not having the necessary background to be president. They then go on to cite the "amateur status" of Barack Obama and list his failings.

Have they not learned anything? Do they really think that another "amateur" would be better?

Why more of the same?

Larry Zak

Lake Villa