Breaking News Bar
posted: 2/20/2013 9:08 PM

Mundelein board candidates divided on video gambling

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 
 

The seven candidates running for seats on Mundelein's village board are split on the issue of video gambling in town.

Two favor it. Three oppose it, and one doesn't have a strong opinion one way or the other.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

The controversial issue came up Wednesday during Daily Herald candidate interviews.

Three seats will be on the April 9 ballot, and all carry 4-year terms.

The candidates are: Dawn Abernathy; Kerry A. Garesche; Gregory S. Jacobs; Holly Kim; Alexander Kvasnicka; Jim Nutschnig; and Raymond T. Semple. Nutschnig and Semple are incumbents.

In October 2012, the village board voted 4-3 to allow local bars, restaurants and fraternal organizations to install video gambling machines for customers.

Kim favors legalization. If people can gamble elsewhere, she said, "why not have them spend their dollar here in Mundelein?"

Kvasnicka supports legal video gambling, too. He touted the possible revenue for the village, but he also took a libertarian approach to the issue.

"I don't think it's the government's job to tell people what to do," he said. "If businesses want to put (the machines) in, they should be able to."

Abernathy said she'd vote to repeal the village ordinance allowing video gambling if given the chance.

Short of that opportunity, she said she opposes any increase in the amount of video gambling allowed in town, and she said the activity "needs to be strictly policed."

Abernathy also doubts it will be the money generator proponents have predicted.

Jacobs opposes local video gambling, too. He referred to the proponents who spoke in favor of the ordinance last year as "foreign entities" who don't live in Mundelein.

Nutschnig voted against video gambling last year and stood by the vote.

"We have casinos in this state," he said. "We have Las Vegas. We have Atlantic City. We don't need that kind of influence in this community."

If entrepreneurs say they need video gambling to survive, Nutschnig wondered if such businesses are needed in Mundelein.

Semple voted against legalizing gambling, too, and his stance hasn't changed. He's concerned the laws could be changed to allow more machines in each establishment or to allow other types of devices, like slot machines.

"I just think it's a dangerous thing," he said.

Garesche expressed no firm objections to video gambling, but she doesn't see the activity as an economic salve, either.

"It seems sort of low brow," she said.

Garesche said she's inclined to vote to repeal the ordinance but could be swayed by businesses that show the revenue is vital to their financial success.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.