Breaking News Bar
updated: 11/28/2012 12:34 PM

Naperville chief: no interest in boosting police pension

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Robert Marshall

      Robert Marshall

 
 

The only new year's resolution Naperville Police Chief Bob Marshall has his eye on is the resolution of his pension status.

Marshall testified before the five-member Naperville Police Pension Board Tuesday that he never even considered re-entering the Illinois Downstate Police Pension program when he was appointed the city's new police chief in May.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Marshall is collecting $98,148 annually from the fund he paid into during his 28-year police career. Since 2005, when he retired and was named assistant city manager, however, Marshall's second pension has been held in the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund. Marshall and city officials have maintained that Marshall should be allowed to continue paying 5 percent of his earnings into the IMRF while also collecting his police pension and his current $151,000 salary.

The ongoing hearing before the pension board was prompted by the state Department of Insurance position that Marshall is once again a police officer and his pension payouts must cease until he retires as chief.

Marshall and city officials argue the state's public pension code distinguishes between police officers and police chiefs and allows police chiefs to continue collecting a pension while paying into another. Department of insurance officials, however, are under the opinion that the code makes no distinction between officers and chiefs.

Marshall said he never considered applying to re-enter the pension fund because he had already earned IMRF credits during his seven-years as assistant city manager.

"I've contributed 5 percent of my paycheck for seven years and I want to continue earning credit in IMRF because I've been in that program, now, since 2005," Marshall testified. "I was satisfied in IMRF and I want to continue earning that service credit."

Marshall, however, has since been informed that he has been "kicked out" of IMRF for also drawing his police pension. He is appealing that decision.

Marshall said he was also cognizant of the stigma associated with public officials who get pay bumps to pad their pensions and didn't want to be perceived as greedy.

Had Marshall applied to re-enter the police pension system as chief, his payments would be calculated on his current salary, as opposed to his approximately $100,000 police officer salary, thus costing the fund more.

"It would have elevated everything," Marshall said. "I didn't want a pension-enhancement type situation. I didn't want to do that."

Attorneys representing Marshall, Naperville and the department of insurance now have until Jan. 2 to file their closing argument briefs and the board will reconvene at 3 p.m. Jan. 15 to deliberate and render their decision regarding whether to continue paying Marshall or suspending his benefits.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here