Breaking News Bar
posted: 4/27/2012 5:17 AM

Home inspector: Drainage problem was not disclosed

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 
 

Q. Our home is listed for sale, and we're concerned about whether to disclose a former drainage problem. The property is in a 100-year flood zone. We used to have flooding in our basement, but this was repaired over a year ago and no water entered the basement during the last rainy season. Do we have to disclose this, and if so, what is the best way to spin it?

A. Be careful how you approach this. When it comes to disclosure, to spin is to sin. The best thing is to tell it the way it is.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Since the house is located in a 100-year flood zone, one year without flooding is not conclusive. What matters is the scope and extent of the corrective work that was done, whether it was done by qualified drainage specialists, and whether the work was permitted and signed off.

Assuming the drainage repairs were done with proper expertise and approval by the building department, full disclosure is still a wise and prudent posture for a seller, and here's why. If any drainage problem occurs in the future, it would be better, in terms of liability, to have disclosed the history to the best of your understanding than to be accused of having withheld information about a pre-existing condition.

We live in a litigious society. When in doubt, disclose.

Q. When we bought our home, the agent said it was 1,510 square feet. Now that we are selling, another agent said it seems smaller. He checked the appraisal from the time of our purchase. It says 1,408 square feet. He called a professional to measure the house again, and this time the result was 1,308 square feet. Why do these measurements keep changing, and how much will this size difference affect the resale value of our home?

A. It is possible that someone included the square footage of the garage when you purchased your home. But this is just a guess. The main issue is appraisal value and how this will be affected by the smaller square footage. Actually, the number of bedrooms and bathrooms in the home will probably have a greater affect on value than the square footage.

To determine how the size difference will affect your resale price, a certified real estate appraiser should be consulted. Ask the appraiser for a "ballpark" estimate of the value difference between 1,510 square feet and 1,308 square feet in your neighborhood.

Q. We bought our house six months ago, after having a home inspection. After the first rains, we had water in our basement. Our home inspector said nothing about this. Can we hold him liable for this oversight?

A. Whether your home inspector should have disclosed potential water intrusion in the basement depends on whether there was evidence of past flooding at the time of the inspection. Conditions that would indicate possible flooding include water stains, dry mud, a high water line, or actual damage. You should call your home inspector and ask for a re-inspection of the basement.

• Email questions to Barry Stone through his website, housedetective.com, or write AMG, 1776 Jami Lee Court, Suite 218, San Luis Obispo, CA 94301.

Access Media Group

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here