Breaking News Bar
updated: 2/23/2011 3:44 PM

John P. Mick II: Candidate Profile

Leyden Township H.S. D212

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • John P. Mick II, running for Leyden Township H.S. D212

      John P. Mick II, running for Leyden Township H.S. D212

 

 

 

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Note: Answers provided have not been edited for grammar, misspellings or typos. In some instances, candidate claims that could not be immediately verified have been omitted.

Jump to:

BioKey IssuesQ&A

 

Bio

City: FRANKLIN PARK

Website: Candidate did not respond.

Office sought: Leyden Township H.S. D212

Age: 57

Family: MARRIED, 4 CHILDREN, ALL GRADUATED LEYDEN H S

Occupation: PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING

Education: B S CIVIL ENGINEERING, NUMEROUS GRADUATE CLASSES AT PURDUE, ILLINOIS, AND OTHERS

Civic involvement: ROTARY, ANNUAL ST PATRICKS PARTY / FUNDRAISER, OLD ST PATS CATHOLIC CHURCH MINISTRY TEAM

Elected offices held: LEYDEN H S DIST 212 17 YEARS

Have you ever been arrested for or convicted of a crime? If yes, please explain: NO

Candidate's Key Issues

Key Issue 1

WHAT'S BEST FOR THE KIDS

Key Issue 2

ELIMINATION OF UNFUNDED STATE AND FEDERAL MANDATES

Key Issue 3

HELPING ALL STUDENTS SUCCEED

Questions & Answers

How satisfied are you that your district is preparing students for the next stage in their lives, whether it be from elementary into high school or high school into college or full-time employment? What changes, if any, do you think need to be made?

VERY!!! WE NEED TO GET RID OF UNFUNDED MANDATES AND LAWS AND LAWMAKERS WHO DON'T HAVE A CLUE ABOUT EDUCATION, AND STRAP OUR STAFF WITH REGULATIONS AND PROCESSES THAT ARE CUMBERSOME, EXPENSIVE AND DONT DO ""WHAT'S BEST FOR THE KIDS""

What budget issues will the district have to confront? What measures do you support to address them? If cuts are needed, be specific about programs and expenses that should be reduced or eliminated. Do you support any tax increases for local schools?

OUR BUDGET IS IN GOOD SHAPE DUE TO SOUND FISCAL MANAGEMENT FOR THE LAST 75 + YEARS. WE HAVEN'T HAD TO MAKE

""CUTS"". WHAT'S SAD FOR OTHERS IS WE HAVE HIRED SEVERAL VERY TALENTED STAFF FROM DISTRICTS WHO ELIMINATED HUNDREDS OF POSITIONS.

Is experience as a teacher or support from a union valuable because it suggests educational insights or detrimental because it creates pro-teacher bias? Please clarify whether you have such experience or would accept union support.

I BELIEVE BOTH ARE VERY VALUABLE. I DONT ""GET SUPPORT"" FROM ANYONE. I DON'T HAVE CAMPAIGN FUNDS. OUR BOARD, ADMINISTRATION AND NUMEROUS UNIONS ALL WORK TOGETHER FOR ""WHAT'S BEST FORE THE KIDS"". I SERVE ON A BOARD WITH A TEACHER AND A PERSON WHO IS IN A UNION, AND THEY BOTH HELP ME GAIN DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES ON ISSUES.

As contract talks come up with various employee groups, what posture should the board take? Do you believe the district should ask for concessions, expect employee costs to stay about the same as they are now or provide increases in pay or benefits?

I'M NOT PREPARED TO REVEAL A BARGAINING POSITION TO THE MEDIA OR YOUR READERS. NEGOTIATIONS ARE BETWEEN TWO INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS AND SHOULD BE PRIVATE. I FOUND THAT DURING OUR LAST ROUND OF GOOD CONTRACTS' REVIEW AND REFINEMENT AND AGREEMENT, ALL THREE OF THE POSITIONS IN YOUR QUESTION CAME INTO PLAY.

If your district had a superintendent or other administrator nearing retirement, would you support a substantial increase in his or her pay to help boost pension benefits? Why or why not?

OUR SUPERINTENDENT IS WORTH EVERY PENNY THEY ARE PAID. I WOULD NOT SUPPORT THE ""SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE"" YOU ASK ABOUT. I OPPOSE THE ""LAST X YEARS"" BOOST WHICH USED TO OCCUR. AND I SUPPORT PENSION REFORM, WHICH MEANS LESS MONEY TO ALL - PRESENT AND FUTURE RETIREES, NOW AND THEN, NOT IN 2014 OR 2020 OR 2050.

Share this page
    help here